Browsers and web applications have many features and mechanisms to protect users and their data from cyber-attacks. One of them is the same-origin policy, in short SOP, introduced by the former browser corporation Netscape in 1996 upon the implementation of JavaScript. This directive prohibits client-side scripting languages like JavaScript and ActionScript, but also stylesheet languages such as CSS, from accessing objects (graphics, videos, etc.) originating from another website or URL.
The origin is defined in the URL as a combination of protocol (e.g. HTTP or HTTPS), domain, and port. The SOP is only considered fulfilled if all three elements are identical, so that cross-site script access is possible. An exception is subdomains that can access objects of higher-level domains via corresponding DOM properties.
However, the boundaries set by the same-origin policy are not beneficial for every type of web project, and can even be obstructive in certain cases – such as in web applications that rely on an asynchronous data transmission between the browser and server (for example, on an Ajax basis). For such projects, solutions to circumvent the directive, like the JSON method JSONP, are required. This is explained in more detail in the following sections.
JSONP (also written as JSON-P) is a method that helps structured data be sent between different domains in JSON format. The acronym stands for JSON (JavaScript Object Notation) with Padding. To bypass the same-origin policy when requesting files from other domains, JSONP does not use the “XMLHttpRequest” object, as the usual JSON code does, but rather the element “script” including a function call. Unlike other files, scripts can also be transferred across domains without the SOP being violated.
JSONP was developed in 2005 by software developer Bob Ippolito and has been integrated into many Web 2.0 frameworks such as Dojo Toolkit, jQuery, or Google Web Toolkit in recent years as a viable alternative to the customary JSON.
JSONP is just one method of many for enabling cross-domain data transfers. A comparable mechanism exists in cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) that is not bound to JSON, but instead works with special HTTP headers.
JSONP solves the same-origin policy problem using <script> elements. As many domains as you like can be specified in the “src”attribute of this element, and the directive does not apply here. Therefore, the attribute can also be used to distinguish URLs that belong to a foreign domain and return JSON code and other files. In such a case, the script itself is exclusively used as a service provider, which sends the JSONP query to the respective web server without having its own effect. In order for the client to be able to subsequently process the data, the server packs this again as a parameter in a JavaScript function, which is already predefined in the web browser and is communicated to the server in the query string (or query part) of the URL.
The format and name of the parameters to be specified in the query string for initiating a JSONP query are not standardized. Therefore, they may differ across web applications.
The following example is intended to clarify the operation of JSONP:
<script type="text/javascript" < codesnippet></script>
src="http://not-origin-url.com/getjson?jsonp=exampleCallback">If this simple JSONP script is embedded in the HTML code of a website and then run by any client, JSON datais accessed by the foreign domain “not-origin-url.com” (“getjson”). The query string “?jsonp=exampleCallback” tells the contacted server that it is a JSONP query. In addition, the information is supplied that it should send the requested data as a parameter of the JavaScript function “exampleCallback”.
The server then generates the appropriate JavaScript code including the queried information as a parameter – in the case of this example, a name-value pair – and returns it to the client:
exampleCallback( {"name":"test", "value":1} );The function call is then executed by the browser as if it were listed directly in the HTML code of the source page. The browser is thereby able to process the data retrieved from the third-party URL.
A single <script> element is required for each JSONP query. Alternatively, you can add a new element on the client side (referred to as script element injection) or reuse an existing element.
The following YouTube tutorial provides a slightly more extensive demonstration of the JSONP method:
In order to protect your privacy, the video will not load until you click on it.
JSONP is a solution for bypassing the SOP that is hotly debated in professional circles, due in particular to the increased security risk associated with script queries. This heightened risk already arises by the fact alone that an additional component is integrated into the processes of the website of origin, whose security system cannot be influenced. If, in fact, the contacted server exhibits vulnerabilities that enable unwanted JavaScript injections (incorporation of JavaScript code) by attackers, the server of origin is automatically exposed to an immediate danger – especially because not only JSON documents (as in the example), but any type of data can be retrieved.
Other known attack patterns that exploit the JSONP method are the following:
Have you ever heard of cross-site scripting (XSS)? This is when unauthorized users take advantage of security gaps in internet browsers and on web servers to plant malware and run it anonymously. But what lies behind these attacks and how can website operators and users protect themselves?
JSON LD gives the programmers the possibility of embedding meta data as script separately from web content. Separating HTML markup and semantic annotation helps ensure a more easily read source text and facilitates tagging meta data for dynamic web content. All of this makes JSON-LD a serious competitor of the data formats RDFa and Microdata.
Websites can be full of security risks, especially when it comes to active content like JavaScript. Cross-site scripting enables cyber criminals to modify this content for their own purposes. This is dangerous for website operators and especially for internet users. The Content Security Policy tries to reduce this risk. Learn what’s behind the security standard and how it works.
The transmission of data in computer networks such as the Internet or between two applications is influenced by various factors. These transmissions focus on performance and security. Protocol Buffers, developed by Google, impresses in both areas and proves to be a worthwhile alternative to classic, text-based data exchange formats such as JSON or XML.
Provide powerful and reliable service to your clients with a web hosting package from IONOS.
