Cryp­tocur­ren­cies: What’s behind these digital currency systems?

In 2008, an unknown in­di­vid­ual or group published the whitepa­per for Bitcoin under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, thereby paving the way for cryp­tocur­ren­cies. To this day, it is still unclear who’s behind the pseudonym and the idea for this rev­o­lu­tion­ary, digital payment in­stru­ment. For many people today, it’s just as unclear what exactly a cryp­tocur­ren­cy is – despite the fact that, one decade after the invention of Bitcoin, there are now more than 2,000 different providers of these digital payment systems, as the im­pres­sive list on the web portal Coin­Mar­ket­Cap shows.

A cryp­tocur­ren­cy (or cryp­toas­set) is a digital means of payment, typically based on blockchain tech­nol­o­gy and cryp­to­graph­ic processes such as hash functions and digital sig­na­tures. Unlike con­ven­tion­al cur­ren­cies, cryp­tocur­ren­cies do not involve physical coins or notes. All units of the currency are ex­clu­sive­ly digital. These asym­met­ri­cal­ly encrypted units of currency are usually generated col­lab­o­ra­tive­ly by the whole system, although in most cases, a pre­de­ter­mined quantity of units is defined at the launch of a cryp­tocur­ren­cy. The term “mining” was coined for the process of gen­er­at­ing units, which is why people talk about “mining cryp­tocur­ren­cies”.

Most cryp­tocur­ren­cy systems are char­ac­ter­ized by a de­cen­tral­ized nature: Not only the gen­er­a­tion of new currency units, but also the in­di­vid­ual trans­ac­tions are typically executed col­lec­tive­ly, as multiple par­tic­i­pants verify and coun­ter­sign them in the re­spec­tive system. Com­mu­ni­ca­tion normally occurs in a peer-to-peer network in which all nodes operate as equals. In contrast to money printed by central banks, classic cryp­tocur­ren­cies have no “single point of failure” – i.e. there is no in­di­vid­ual point in the network that can jeop­ar­dize or dominate the func­tion­ing or trading of the currency system. An exception can be found in cryp­tocur­ren­cies like Ripple, which are run by private companies that perform most of the unit gen­er­a­tion process them­selves and dis­trib­ute them according to their own rules.

As a result of the hy­per­in­fla­tion of the bolívar fuerte, Venezuela not only in­tro­duced the new currency, the bolívar soberano, but also tied it to the Petro cryp­tosys­tem. Even though the Venezue­lan gov­ern­ment proclaims it to be the “first national cryp­tocur­ren­cy”, the Petro lacks key char­ac­ter­is­tics of a cryp­tocur­ren­cy precisely due to its state gov­er­nance, such as the de­cen­tral­i­ty of the system or the equality of all par­tic­i­pants. Similar con­tro­ver­sy surrounds the privately managed systems already mentioned, like Ripple.

A closer look at the three el­e­men­tary com­po­nents of a cryp­tocur­ren­cy reveals that, although private and state-run systems fulfill the “crypto” aspect, they have little to do with the classic principle of Bitcoin.

Cryp­tog­ra­phy not only gives these cur­ren­cies their name, it is also a critical dis­ci­pline for the security of cryp­tocur­ren­cies. The term “cryp­tog­ra­phy” refers to the science behind en­cryp­tion and the general pro­tec­tion of data and in­for­ma­tion. Both are vital for a cashless and fully digital payment system that, as standard, operates without a central reg­u­la­to­ry body. Cryp­tocur­ren­cies primarily use two cryp­to­graph­ic processes:

• Hash functions
• Digital sig­na­tures

Hash functions represent the el­e­men­tary pieces of the puzzle for checking the integrity of the data and encoding the account addresses and trans­ac­tions of par­tic­i­pants. They also provide the basis for the blockchain and block mining. Digital sig­na­tures enable the status of encrypted in­for­ma­tion to be verified without dis­clo­sure. This tech­nol­o­gy is employed, for example, in order to protect the content of e-mails. In the case of cryp­tocur­ren­cies, it is used to sign trans­ac­tions and com­mu­ni­cate to the network that a trans­ac­tion has been approved.

Blockchain refers to the de­cen­tral­ized ledger of a cryp­tocur­ren­cy that records all trans­ac­tions in what are known as blocks. The recording of the in­di­vid­ual blocks takes place in fragments and in chrono­log­i­cal order, so that a (mostly) public, immutable and ver­i­fi­able record emerges over time. It is main­tained by the par­tic­i­pants of the un­der­ly­ing peer-to-peer network, who follow a defined protocol in order to validate new trans­ac­tions. In this process, all nodes au­to­mat­i­cal­ly download a complete copy of the blockchain, dis­pens­ing with the need for a central authority to inspect executed trans­ac­tions.

A data record based on blockchain tech­nol­o­gy cannot be altered without the consent of the other network par­tic­i­pants.

The third important pillar of cryp­tocur­ren­cies is known as block mining. This refers to the process necessary in order to append new trans­ac­tions in the cryp­tosys­tem as blocks to the blockchain. Mining requires certain software that can solve math­e­mat­i­cal problems and thereby find the un­der­ly­ing hash functions. All network par­tic­i­pants can attempt to solve each math­e­mat­i­cal problem for val­i­dat­ing a new block of trans­ac­tions. This procedure is also known as the “Proof of Work” that has to be produced. Once a block is correctly mined and the output of the hash function is guar­an­teed, all network par­tic­i­pants can check whether the solution is correct.

However, the reward for suc­cess­ful mining is only received by the miner whose computer solved the problem first. Typically, a block reward – as this type of reward is called – is a set number of currency units as well as all trans­ac­tion fees as­so­ci­at­ed with the newly added block.

They're called cryp­tocur­ren­cies for a reason: their sim­i­lar­i­ty to real cur­ren­cies with notes and coins, as well as the fact that users of Bitcoin or similar in­flu­en­tial al­ter­na­tives like Ethereum, IOTA or Monero possess an exchange value (demand and use) have brought the digital currency systems into dis­cus­sion as the potential means of payment of the future. Bitcoin in par­tic­u­lar is already in use in this respect. Various online sales platforms such as Overstock have adopted Bitcoin payments into their reper­toire of available payment methods. But even the top cryp­tocur­ren­cy has not yet es­tab­lished itself as a means of payment, primarily due to the sig­nif­i­cant fluc­tu­a­tions in value.

Cryp­tocur­ren­cies are also being used for other purposes es­pe­cial­ly in the start-up sector:

So long as the units of a cryp­tocur­ren­cy have a certain exchange value that can be converted to a central bank currency like the dollar, cryp­tocur­ren­cy can in principle be used as a means of payment. But to actually pay with digital money, the vendor must also accept the cryp­tocur­ren­cy. In order to execute a payment, a pair of keys is required, com­pris­ing a public and private key.

The public key is visible to anyone and es­sen­tial­ly has the same role as a bank account number: it serves as the sender’s address from which a user carries out a payment with the re­spec­tive cryp­tocur­ren­cy. Con­verse­ly, the private key is used for verifying a trans­ac­tion, a bit like a password or PIN. It should only be visible to the owner of the crypto address used to sign a trans­ac­tion. In the case of the latter, this is usually au­to­mat­i­cal­ly performed by a wallet, the virtual account that stores a cryp­tocur­ren­cy. In other words, users only have to enter the amount and the target address, i.e. the public key, of the payee when making a payment.

Ever since Bitcoin’s spec­tac­u­lar price boom in 2017, cryp­tocur­ren­cies have been a popular spec­u­la­tive in­vest­ment. In just a short space of time, interest in investing in the cryp­tocur­ren­cy sector has risen con­sid­er­ably. And there are some different ways to invest in one of the cur­ren­cies available on the market.

Like foreign exchange trading, cryp­tocur­ren­cies can also be used as a tradable commodity, with the aim of ex­ploit­ing price swings in order to increase the investor’s capital. The dif­fer­ence with cryp­tocur­ren­cies is that there are no central banks, financial su­per­vi­so­ry bodies or gov­ern­ment reg­u­la­to­ry au­thor­i­ties to monitor the monetary supply and step in when the market overheats. Units of various cryp­tocur­ren­cies can be bought, sold and exchanged on trading platforms like Coin­Switch, which always display the most up-to-date prices. Al­ter­na­tive­ly, it’s also possible to invest in­di­rect­ly in cryp­tocur­ren­cies via con­ven­tion­al exchanges, by betting on price fluc­tu­a­tions or pur­chas­ing the shares of companies involved in the cryp­tocur­ren­cy sector.

Due to the fact that there are more than 2,000 different cryp­tocur­ren­cies worldwide, it’s no wonder that even rec­og­nized experts are not familiar with all the different providers and their models. Anyone who wishes to invest in cryp­tocur­ren­cy has no choice but to monitor the market closely and seek out suitable solutions. Es­pe­cial­ly for newer or more unknown cur­ren­cies, there is always the risk of falling victim to fraud or the system com­plete­ly col­laps­ing. The following list contains some of the es­tab­lished cryp­tocur­ren­cies char­ac­ter­ized by a high market cap­i­tal­iza­tion (a high value of total shares in cir­cu­la­tion):

Cryp­tocur­ren­cies offer key op­por­tu­ni­ties and pos­si­bil­i­ties that con­ven­tion­al cur­ren­cies lack. In par­tic­u­lar, blockchain tech­nol­o­gy has so far offered com­pelling potential in a variety of sectors, which is why it is also being used in numerous projects beyond the financial industry. The lack of a central authority anchored in most cryp­tosys­tems also generally rep­re­sents a promising in­no­va­tion. The as­so­ci­at­ed freedom from market reg­u­la­tion, however, also poses one of the greatest problems with cryp­tocur­ren­cies. Since there is also a lack of a con­sis­tent exchange value, the prices of cryp­tocur­ren­cies are subject to severe fluc­tu­a­tions and the ever-present risk of a total system crash.

The pros and cons of cryp­tocur­ren­cies compared to con­ven­tion­al monetary and currency systems are sum­ma­rized in the following table:

Click here for important legal dis­claimers.