Lighting, back­ground music, fragrance – selling strate­gies in retail are no longer limited to just product placement. To ensure that a trip to the store leads to a purchase, marketing experts plan the layout of the retail space down to the finest detail. The goal is to create an en­vi­ron­ment or ambience that is ‘sale-friendly’ and speaks to the customer’s sub­con­scious. This en­vi­ron­ment is not just important for the ‘brick and mortar’ retail sector but also for online sales. The e-commerce sector makes use of any and all means to bring attention to the products and services that they offer.

On a daily basis, online consumers are con­front­ed by an excessive amount of offers from so many companies, many of whom are more or less selling the same thing. This flood of offers means that online retailers must ask them­selves: ‘Why should the consumer choose to buy from us and not from the com­peti­tor?’ But purely rational ap­proach­es and con­sid­er­a­tions here play a rel­a­tive­ly minor role – at least according to neu­ro­science. Neu­rol­o­gists believe the decision to buy has a lot more to do with the parts of the brain that deal with the pro­cess­ing of emotions and be­hav­ioral instincts. Trying to figure just how much neu­ro­log­i­cal factors have to do with marketing is in many ways the de­f­i­n­i­tion of neu­ro­mar­ket­ing.

What is neu­ro­mar­ket­ing?

Neu­ro­mar­ket­ing is an in­ter­dis­ci­pli­nary research field that positions itself between market research and neu­roe­co­nom­ics. While neu­roe­con­o­mists attempt to explain economic decision processes with the help of neu­ro­log­i­cal methods, neu­ro­mar­keters on the other hand use these ex­pla­na­tions to develop new marketing strate­gies and in­stru­ments.

Neu­roe­co­nom­ic research is based on the as­sump­tion that decisions are largely made based on sub­con­scious actions. When it comes to making a purchase, it is emotions and not rational con­sid­er­a­tions that dictate our buying decision.

The aim of neu­ro­mar­ket­ing is the op­ti­miza­tion of marketing processes and, fig­u­ra­tive­ly speaking, gaining an insight into the brain of the consumer. The goal is to decipher what sub­con­scious processes take place during a purchase or the viewing of an ad­ver­tise­ment. Re­searchers and marketing spe­cial­ists hope to acquire an accurate view of the purchase decision making process, which then leads to a purchase. With this in­for­ma­tion, neu­ro­mar­keters now claim to be able to find the answers that up until now have remained elusive from the more classic marketing in­stru­ments, such as surveys, etc. Even the most co­op­er­a­tive of test subjects cannot provide in­for­ma­tion relating to processes that take place sub­con­scious­ly.

Neu­ro­mar­ket­ing in­stru­ments

The human brain is a com­pli­cat­ed network made up of ap­prox­i­mate­ly 100 billion nerve cells. It processes sensory per­cep­tions, co­or­di­nates complex behavior, and acts as a central storage facility for all processed in­for­ma­tion. As the base for all thoughts, opinions, attitudes, wishes, and purposes, the brain is the physical bedrock of an in­di­vid­ual’s mental processes and con­fig­u­ra­tions, as well as their cognition and emotion. The way in which all these interact with each other and lead to decision processes is the subject of various research areas. But there are no con­clu­sive answers, and neu­ro­science has committed itself to answering this question by at­tempt­ing to un­der­stand the physical and bi­o­log­i­cal processes that take place in the brain. This is done primarily through non-invasive neu­ro­phys­i­o­log­i­cal methods of ex­am­i­na­tion, like elec­troen­cephalog­ra­phy (EEG) and func­tion­al magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

  • EEG: Elec­troen­cephalog­ra­phy is the mea­sure­ment of the elec­tron­ic activity in the brain. This method of mea­sure­ment gathers voltage fluc­tu­a­tions along the surface of the head, and then plots them graph­i­cal­ly. Being a non-imaging process, it provides in­for­ma­tion on phys­i­o­log­i­cal reactions in the brain, but doesn’t lay them out in relation to the un­der­ly­ing anatom­i­cal struc­tures. This means that re­searchers can record that a certain stimulus has triggered a reaction, but they are unable to figure out in which part of the brain this took place.
  • fMRI: Func­tion­al magnetic resonance imaging is an imaging method that makes it possible to create a spatial rep­re­sen­ta­tion of the activated part of the brain. fMRI also make it possible to make use of different magnetic com­po­nents of oxy­genat­ed and de­oxy­genat­ed blood to identify metabolic changes to blood cir­cu­la­tion. This in turn zones in on the neuronal activity in the cor­re­spond­ing part of the brain. In contrast to non-imaging processes like EEG, the reactions can be at­trib­uted to a specific area of the brain.

Further to ad­ver­tis­ing research, neu­ro­mar­ket­ing can also draw on psy­chophys­i­o­log­i­cal behaviors, i.e. mea­sure­ments like heart rate, electro dermal activity, and eye tracking.

  • Heart rate mea­sure­ment: This is where the number of heart beats during a certain period is measured. The aim is to correlate the arousal of the test person with various stimuli.
  • Elec­tro­der­mal activity (EDA):  Elec­tro­der­mal reaction refers to a short sub­si­dence of the elec­tri­cal prop­er­ties of the skin. This is caused by the emotional-effective reactions in the sym­pa­thet­ic nervous system. If the pre­sen­ta­tion of a stimulus leads to an elec­tro­der­mal reaction, then this is a sign of the test subject’s arousal.
  • Eye tracking: Eye tracking means you gather data on the eye movement of a test subject while they are presented with visual stimuli. Using technical ap­pa­ra­tus­es, the eye movement can be recorded and divided into fixations, i.e. when the eye gaze pauses in a certain position, and saccades, i.e. when the eye moves to a different position.

Ad­ver­tis­ing research

Neu­ro­mar­ket­ing often involves a com­bi­na­tion of psycho and neu­ro­phys­i­o­log­i­cal ex­am­i­na­tion methods. This is done with the intention of analyzing the reaction of potential target groups to ad­ver­tise­ments, product design, the struc­tur­ing of the design process, or indeed even the design of a retail space. Possible stimuli, whose impact can be monitored, are different versions of an ad­ver­tise­ment, a website, the user interface of a software, or maybe a product packaging. E-commerce relies on processes like these to fa­cil­i­tate the optimal design and placement of ad­ver­tise­ments, order buttons, visual elements, and calls to action.

Where does the consumer look? How does he/she react to it? Which parts of the brain are stim­u­lat­ed as a result? These are all key questions. The goal is, through neu­ro­log­i­cal processes, to be able to un­der­stand the physical actions stim­u­lat­ed by ad­ver­tis­ing material and layout. This usually means that tech­niques such as eye-tracking must be applied to measure the eye movement and the attention span caused by the stimulus. This, combined with an imaging process like fMRI, can evaluate which neuronal area was stim­u­lat­ed by observing a stimulus. If a test subject responds to a certain stimulus via neuronal activity in a certain part of the brain, this then implies that this effect can be assigned to that cor­re­spond­ing area of the brain.

It must be noted that neuro and psy­chophys­i­o­log­i­cal studies mostly take place in a lab­o­ra­to­ry en­vi­ron­ment. This allows for in­for­ma­tion on brain activity and the in­volve­ment of certain anatom­i­cal struc­tures. But being able to correctly interpret the results with marketing issues in mind is only possible if the ex­per­i­ment results are com­pat­i­ble with fun­da­men­tal neu­ro­sci­en­tif­ic and psy­cho­log­i­cal knowledge, so that a relevant cor­re­la­tion can then be iden­ti­fied.

Example: Judging brain activity in the amygdala, a part of the so-called limbic system, when presented with a certain stimulus is only possible when this part of the brain is then at­trib­uted with being emo­tion­al­ly affected by this in­for­ma­tion. Emotional psy­chol­o­gy research has es­tab­lished that emotions very strongly influence the way in which we take in and evaluate the world around us. Neu­ro­sci­en­tif­ic studies, par­tic­u­lar­ly those by António Damásio (Descartes’ Error) and Joseph LeDoux (The Emotional Brain), prove in­sight­ful in this regard. What they have shown is that emotions that influence attention and memory, as well as emotional eval­u­a­tion, i.e. all that is assessed emo­tion­al­ly, are processed at a deeper level.

Of par­tic­u­lar interest to marketing experts is the mesolim­bic system and its neu­ro­trans­mit­ter dopamine. An ac­ti­va­tion of the so-called reward center is connected with feelings of joy and pleasure. According to neu­ro­sci­en­tists, one of the key functions of the mesolim­bic system is the strength­en­ing of the readiness to act. An ac­ti­va­tion in the cor­re­spond­ing areal is in­ter­pret­ed as a positive stimulus, which in turn link to mo­ti­va­tion. This means that the mesolim­bic system plays a role in the positive re­in­force­ment and learning through reward.

A con­nec­tion has been found between achieving a profit and the ac­ti­va­tion of the reward center. This sensation is not just prompted by an in­di­vid­ual achieving a profit because of making a decision, but can also come from joyfully an­tic­i­pat­ing a future reward. For example, tests in the area of product design have shown that sports and luxury cars have been known to have activated the rewarding areas of the brain much stronger compared to hybrid cars. This reaction can be explained by social ranking, which is often heavily as­so­ci­at­ed with these kinds of cars. Raising your status can also be a form of social reward, even if it has not yet been achieved but is only a future prospect.

If this actually leads to consumers grabbing for their credit cards is another issue entirely. Ul­ti­mate­ly, not all purchase decisions are ones that have suc­cess­ful­ly appealed to an in­di­vid­ual’s emotions with marketing actions. Many other factors are also involved in potential customers’ decision making process, including; their state of mind of at that exact moment, rec­om­men­da­tions from friends and family, and past ex­pe­ri­ences with products and services. On top of this, there are also external factors, such as in­ter­rup­tions and dis­trac­tions caused by others. These can also influence consumers’ buying process. The fun­da­men­tal issues when it comes to marketing cannot be addressed based solely on neurons and neuronal activity.

Neuronal marketing: the tricks of the ad­ver­tis­ing trade

When it comes to figuring out exactly how neu­ro­mar­ket­ing works, limits are defined by the current knowledge levels of general brain science and research. And in many of the areas relevant to marketing and ad­ver­tis­ing, little more than the basic amount of research exists. Tech­ni­cal­ly elaborate ap­pa­ra­tus­es, expensive series of ex­per­i­ments, and Pow­er­Point pre­sen­ta­tions featuring colorful pictures of the brain, all disguise the fact that the current state of research is fairly limited. This also applies to the actively complex topics around cognition and emotion, where research is still a long way from done.

The idea that emotions, when mixed with brand awareness, can promote sales is in no way a new idea and is one which has been adapted by ad­ver­tis­ing psy­chol­o­gists through­out the last century. And ad­ver­tis­ers demon­strate it without the use of expensive fMRI studies. But there is no doubt that the amount of influence exerted by neu­roe­co­nom­ic, psy­cho­log­i­cal, and cognitive sci­en­tif­ic theories in the minds of marketers is certainly in­creas­ing. But not only empirical mea­sure­ment methods are being utilized. Instead of inviting test subjects into a lab­o­ra­to­ry, marketing experts instead turn to existing concepts, like arousal, herding, emo­tion­al­i­ty, priming, and other hy­pothe­ses of es­tab­lished marketers in order to develop sales tricks, which can influence consumers’ sub­con­scious decision-making processes.

Herding

Human beings act based on the behavior of people around them, mostly without con­scious­ly deciding to do so. If one person begins to speak quietly, the other will begin to whisper. If one person feels the need to yawn, it’s often the case that a second person won’t be able to stop them­selves from yawning either. Neu­ro­science explains this phe­nom­e­non with the aptly named mirror neurons. This was first recorded by the research group of the Italian neu­ro­phys­i­ol­o­gist Giacomo Rizzolati. He dis­cov­ered that the neurons in a certain part of an in­di­vid­ual’s brain not only reacted when the test subject carried out a motor hand to object in­ter­ac­tion, but that this was also the case when a similar movement was observed being carried out by another test person. Today we know that all it takes is for a gesture, e.g. a yawn, to be seen to cause a sub­con­scious mirror reaction.

The mirror neurons theory also explains the phe­nom­e­non of the herd mentality, something which can be observed both in animals and in humans. This refers to the way in which a group of in­di­vid­u­als will col­lec­tive­ly behave in a similar manner, without any organized con­trol­ling. This ‘herding’ term has now also found its way into marketing jargon. While neu­ro­phys­i­ol­o­gists limit them­selves to re­search­ing the brains of primates, such as observing test subjects eating ice cream, ad­ver­tis­ing experts use the herd mentality to give their target market a shove in the desired direction.

A technical marketing use of the herding phe­nom­e­non can be seen in the area of user-generated product reviews, something which is now offered by nearly every single online shop. It is no secret that the consumer is more likely to favor the products and services that have been bought by others and sub­se­quent­ly been found to be sat­is­fac­to­ry. Who would choose to book a room in a hotel which, because of poor hygiene standards and un­friend­ly staff, has been given one star out of five by a previous visitor?

Marketing experts assume that the herding effect is much stronger when linked to rec­om­men­da­tions made by prominent per­son­al­i­ties. Tes­ti­mo­ni­al ad­ver­tis­ing is an everyday oc­cur­rence now with regards to herding marketing. Why would you ever choose to drink Budweiser, when Heineken has now become the drink of choice for James Bond?

While celebrity en­dorse­ments have been around for decades, new forms of ad­ver­tis­ing like Let’s Play, hauls, and unboxing videos are now emerging. What these basically entail is consumers trying out video games or unboxing and sampling recently bought products, and then hopefully rec­om­mend­ing them to others. The viewing figures of these sorts of videos on YouTube and other video streaming sites only go to show how large the audience is that can be reached with this form of user-generated ad­ver­tis­ing.

Emo­tion­al­ized branding

If you buy into the idea that emotions influence the pro­cess­ing of in­for­ma­tion relating to memory, thought, and decision processes, then it is obvious that you must link brands, products, and services with emotion. To remain memorable to consumers it is no longer suf­fi­cient to make clear and rational points. In many ways, it is much more important to emphasize the emotional value of a brand, product, or service.

The emotional sig­nif­i­cance of certain brands in the minds of consumers can really be judged by observing the market for the likes of energy drinks, chocolate bars, and lemonade.
Here, it is the brands that have relied on emo­tion­al­ized ad­ver­tis­ing for years that are the market leaders. With these brands, there is one ad­ver­tis­ing style that is king: sto­ry­telling. While this marketing trick may sound quite simple, finding good stories and then telling them in a way that evokes emotion is the key to major success in marketing.

A textbook example of a brand that is most certainly emo­tion­al­ly charged is Coca Cola. When blindly tasted, test subjects have been known to say that the main com­peti­tor Pepsi actually tastes better. But if they see the branded bottles, then the majority will nearly always go for Coca-Cola. This shows how the company has managed to skill­ful­ly link their brand with a certain emotion. So much so that it will override objective taste sen­sa­tions. Let’s be honest: who’s going to be thinking of Pepsi when you see images of the iconic Coca-Cola Christmas truck rolling past on the TV or on a billboard?

A sci­en­tif­ic ex­pla­na­tion for how brands manage to emo­tion­al­ize them­selves is offered by the priming effect and also the somatic marker hy­poth­e­sis (SMH).

Priming

Priming refers to a term from psy­chol­o­gy which denotes a phe­nom­e­non where the pro­cess­ing of a stimulus (the target stimulus) is in­flu­enced by the fact that a previous stimulus (cue stimulus) has activated an implicit memory. This implicit memory will recall ex­pe­ri­ences that lead to specific as­so­ci­a­tions, and sub­con­scious­ly affect an in­di­vid­ual’s behavior. Priming dis­tin­guish­es itself from other explicit memories, which can be con­scious­ly called on and ar­tic­u­lat­ed.  A priming stimulus can be a word, image, smell, or a gesture.

The first reference to the priming effect can be found in the work of psy­chol­o­gist John A. Bargh, whose Florida ex­per­i­ment has gone down his­tor­i­cal­ly as one of the classic ex­per­i­ments in psy­chol­o­gy. Bargh demon­strat­ed that the behavior of the test subject can be in­flu­enced by priming. Two different lists of words were used as the priming stimuli. The ex­per­i­ment saw the ex­per­i­men­tal group receive two suc­ces­sive lists of words, like for­get­table, bald, grey, and Florida; all words that were obviously linked to the theme of old age. The control group, on the other hand, were presented with a list of words from a range of other themes. Central to the ex­per­i­ment was the change of rooms that took place between the first and second tasks. Bargh noticed that the ex­per­i­men­tal group, which had been primed by the list of words to do with age, moved much slower to the next room compared to the control group. This allowed him to make the con­clu­sion that simply reading certain words had sub­con­scious­ly affected the behavior of the test subjects.

Bargh’s Florida ex­per­i­ment attracted attention, not just because of the im­pli­ca­tions regarding human decision-making and free will, but also because it could not be repli­cat­ed in later studies. It was still the case, however, that similar effects were demon­strat­ed by other, com­pa­ra­ble social psy­cho­log­i­cal and psy­cholin­guis­tic studies. Today, ‘priming’ has es­tab­lished itself as a standard term in psy­chol­o­gy.

Even in marketing, strate­gies are used that can be found to lead back to the priming effect. Re­gard­less of whether it has to do with the creation of ad­ver­tis­ing material, the design of a website, or the fur­nish­ing of a retail space. In all these cases, stimuli in the form of words, pictures, and even smells are used to influence the consumer on a sub­con­scious level. Alongside semantic priming, there is also a large focus on affective priming and the stim­u­la­tion of emotions. These are some examples of how, for example, stereo­types, prej­u­dices, and needs can all be triggered by certain stimuli.

  • Semantic priming refers to a priming effect, wherein a verbal stimuli activates a word as­so­ci­a­tion (semantic field). Priming studies have shown that the pro­cess­ing of a word can be in­flu­enced by a previous one, insomuch that both words share a semantic re­la­tion­ship. For example: Test subjects com­pre­hend the word ‘nurse’ faster if the word ‘doctor’ is read be­fore­hand. This phe­nom­e­non is explained by psy­cholin­guists and cognitive sci­en­tists by the fact that in­di­vid­ual words lead to the ac­ti­va­tion of an entire concept or theme. As soon as we read the word ‘doctor’ we im­me­di­ate­ly begin to run through scenes from ER or Scrubs in our heads.
  • Affective priming refers to a priming effect, wherein the emotional con­no­ta­tions of a previous stimuli (cue stimulus) impacts on the pro­cess­ing of a sub­se­quent stimuli (target stimulus). Studies done by the American social psy­chol­o­gist Russell Fazio have shown that the pro­cess­ing of an affective stimulus is sim­pli­fied when it is preceded by a con­sis­tent­ly affective stimulus, i.e. a stimulus that provokes a similar feeling.

Depending on the re­la­tion­ship between the cue stimulus and target stimulus, either positive or negative priming effects can be observed. Therefore, the pro­cess­ing of the target stimulus will be either ac­cel­er­at­ed or delayed. With regards to neu­ro­mar­ket­ing, an invoking of positive emotions is what is sought after. Products and brands should have over­whelm­ing­ly positive con­no­ta­tions and therefore be anchored in the memories of the intended target audience.

Above all, ad­ver­tis­ers strive to provoke positive as­so­ci­a­tions and affects through priming, sub­se­quent­ly conveying this feeling onto an ad­ver­tised product or service. In order to do this, stimuli in the form of words, images, music, gestures, and fra­grances are all utilized to pave the way for the ad­ver­tis­ing message. There are countless examples of affective priming to be seen in the motor industry, which in adverts for luxury and sports cars either usually highlight the joy of driving or the ac­com­pa­ny­ing feeling of freedom. On the other hand, rational arguments such as energy ef­fi­cien­cy or good value play a rel­a­tive­ly minor role.

When it comes to con­nect­ing emotions with brands, products, and services, ad­ver­tis­ers will rely on the use of rep­e­ti­tion. A prime example of this is the McDonald’s slogan ‘I’m lovin’ it’. Re­gard­less of whether on TV, online, or on product packaging, the brand is connected with the most positive emotional state. And this is done in the hope that these positive emotions will in turn transform into a positive view of what the fast food restau­rant has to offer. This transfer of emotions is referred to as a halo effect in social psy­chol­o­gy. What is happening here is a cognitive dis­tor­tion, where the known qualities of a person, brand, or product are de­ter­mined by unknown qualities.

Somatic markers

The somatic marker hy­poth­e­sis can be traced back to the neu­ro­sci­en­tist António Damásio and is based on the as­sump­tion that emotional ex­pe­ri­ences are embedded in people and therefore play a large role in decision processes. According to Damásio, the choice between two al­ter­na­tives is par­tic­u­lar­ly in­flu­enced by un­con­scious body signals, a.k.a. somatic markers. Anatom­i­cal­ly, these are to be found in the pre­frontal cortex, and control a person’s pre­ven­ta­tive and approach man­ner­isms.

If, in a certain situation, an in­di­vid­ual senses a positive body signal, e.g. joy, this in turn results in a sub­con­scious approach behavior. If negative feelings, like disgust or fear were to arise, then this will usually lead to avoidance in the cor­re­spond­ing situation. If we are to believe Damásio’s theory, then body signals in the form of somatic markers represent a precursor to the rational decision process, i.e. they act as a type of pre-decision. Added to this, somatic markers link emotional reactions to memories of specific events, meaning everyone has their own sort of emotional memory. If it so happens that at a later point a person comes into contact again with the re­spec­tive stimulus, this will lead to a repeat-ex­pe­ri­enc­ing of the cor­re­spond­ing emotions. This, then, acts as a type of guiding system, which during a decision-making process will give a push in the right direction.

The origin of Damásios’ hy­poth­e­sis was ob­ser­va­tions of patients with damaged frontal lobes. These patients en­coun­tered dif­fi­cul­ties when it came to making decisions, despite having a con­sis­tent level of in­tel­li­gence and a working social en­vi­ron­ment. Somatic markers are of huge im­por­tance when it comes to neu­ro­mar­ket­ing. If Damásios’ con­clu­sions are to be believed, then every emo­tion­al­ized com­mu­ni­ca­tion with regards to ad­ver­tis­ing or brand strategy leads to a somatic marker. And in turn, each new in­ter­ac­tion with the ad­ver­tised product or brand will then influence future decisions.

Crit­i­cisms of neu­ro­mar­ket­ing

Does neu­ro­mar­ket­ing signal the end of the self-de­ter­min­ing consumer? While marketing experts are pre­dict­ing a golden age, consumer advisors are voicing their concerns. Ever-rising consumer credit is reflected by the ever-in­creas­ing amount of people in financial dif­fi­cul­ty, and the free will of the consumer has become a serious bone of con­tention. But is neu­ro­mar­ket­ing really a threat to consumers’ free will?


One thing is clear; there is no such thing as a ‘buy button’ in the heads of consumers, despite what may have been suggested in popular sci­en­tif­ic pub­li­ca­tions. The inner workings of the human brain are simply too complex and cannot simply be broken down or figured out by basic sales tricks. Instead of this, neu­ro­science offers ex­pla­na­tions and theories relating to human thought, per­cep­tion, and decision processes, all of which are based on un­der­ly­ing bi­o­log­i­cal struc­tures of the brain.

These de­vel­op­ments in brain research are valuable to marketers, as they allow for a better un­der­stand­ing of consumers’ decision process. This, in turn, means that products, adverts, and sales channels can be designed to grab people’s attention, evoke emotions, and then remain in their memory – three factors that have always been known to promote sales. With this in mind, neu­ro­mar­ket­ing can be seen as less of a rev­o­lu­tion and more of an evolution of es­tab­lished consumer research. Past methods and findings have not become ir­rel­e­vant. Instead, they are merely being sub­stan­ti­at­ed and expanded by results in neu­ro­sci­en­tif­ic research, and are helping to reveal more com­pre­hen­sive insight into consumer behavior. Neu­ro­mar­ket­ing is simply one of many com­po­nents of the marketing process.

There have been some disputes about the extent to which findings in neu­ro­mar­ket­ing can and should be used to purposely ma­nip­u­late consumers. But the idea of a remote-con­trolled consumer, who feels compelled to buy something due to some jazzed-up ad­ver­tis­ing, purely remains something from a science fiction movie. But it does pose one question: To what degree is ma­nip­u­la­tion possible through ad­ver­tis­ing?

The term ‘ma­nip­u­la­tion’ usually implies sway tactics, which are unclear to un­sus­pect­ing victims and therefore un­con­trol­lable. Everyone knows that ad­ver­tis­ing is there to fa­cil­i­tate selling, and most consumers are aware that when they visit an online store, that the retailer will un­doubt­ed­ly describe the products and services on offer in a positive way, and also that the website will be laid out in such a way that the ‘Buy’ button will always catch the eye. Many tactics and ap­proach­es adopted by ad­ver­tis­ers are sub­se­quent­ly discussed by the consumers them­selves. A prime example of this is the ex­pres­sion ‘Sex sells!’ In this sense, neuro-economic research acts as a form of consumer pro­tec­tion. As people become aware of the inner workings of ad­ver­tis­ing, its power is curtailed and marketing tricks debunked.

Go to Main Menu